as there is an opposing direction between inner perception of my. It discusses some unsolved problems, such as the conceptual status of noncognitive response classes and the strategy of functional analysis. which guarantees those norms with respect to both behavior and meaning (Olkowski 2002. The chapter highlights some differences between self-perception and interpersonal perception and shift of paradigm in social psychology. The reinterpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena and other self-perception phenomena have been discussed. But precisely because such experiments are subject to alternative interpretations, they cannot be used as unequivocal evidence for self-perception theory. Several experiments and paradigms from the cognitive dissonance literature are amenable to self-perception interpretations. This chapter traces the conceptual antecedents and empirical consequences of these propositions, attempts to place the theory in a slightly enlarged frame of reference, and clarifies just what phenomena the theory can and cannot account for in the rapidly growing experimental literature of self-attribution phenomena. Thus, to the extent that internal cues are weak, ambiguous, or uninterpretable, the individual is functionally in the same position as an outside observer, an observer who must necessarily rely upon those same external cues to infer the individual's inner states. Individuals come to “know” their own attitudes, emotions, and other internal states partially by inferring them from observations of their own overt behavior and/ or the circumstances in which this behavior occurs.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |